SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: koan who wrote (513048)9/15/2009 3:45:00 PM
From: Taro  Read Replies (1) of 1578494
 
Koan,
I also have two bright guys just recently out of college and I always listen to both of them.
Thus I read your message and ask as follows:

1) he says almost all of the scientists in the field say they are very sure GW is caused by man and is very dangerous.

This is up to dispute. A lot of sincere scientists question any conclusions as per above.

2) unless anyone is capable of telling the two methane molecules mentioned above apart, they quite frankly are not qualified to comment on GW.

I welcome that finally CH3OH is becoming an issue besides CO2, very important.
If the difference between different methane molecules is import<ant pertinent to GW or not, I have no clue.
That said, never forget the effects of N2O, an extremely potent 'Global Warmer' gas.

Please ask your son about that one, I'm truly curious here.

Taro
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News