Should God be replaced? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Solon who wrote (27198)	9/17/2009 8:54:30 AM
From: average joe	of 28931

The land Greg or e trespassed on was disposed Crown Land under title of a mineral disposition. His tea cozy relationship with the lord does not give him the right to trespass on a claim under valid disposition. It also precludes him from sampling ore. The sampling of ore might affect negatively or even positively affect the stock price of the company if said ore was to be improperly collected, stored or assayed by an amateur such as Greg or e. A public company is required by law to have a QP or qualified person collect all ore that is being submitted for analysis where the information is to be made public. This is done to protect the public from unscrupulous operators like Greg or e who may have deliberately been trying to manipulate the price of the stock. Who knows what kind of stock position Greg or e might have in the company and what he was really trying to show with those pictures. We had a similar case years ago where a government geologist who was subsequently fired trespassed on one of our RC holes to collect samples of drill cuttings to analyze for diamond indicator minerals. The land he trespassed on was patented minerals under lease and not owned by the Crown and not subject to the Crown Land Act.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next