SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Obama - Clinton Disaster

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Wayners who wrote (19185)9/17/2009 7:04:16 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Read Replies (1) of 103300
 
The Supreme Court has (wrongly IMO...) interpreted the Commerce Clause so very BROADLY (ever since they leaned over backwards in the early nineteen seventies to find a 'constitutional reason' for federal involvement in marijuana prohibition - previously assumed, as with alcohol, to be a matter for the States) that EVERYTHING under the Sun is considered covered by the Commerce Clause.

Even things which specifically ARE NOT SOLD ACROSS STATE LINES.

So, by the expansive view of federal powers that the Supremes have held to ever since then, there is absolutely no way that health insurance could *not* be considered to be in the fed's purview.

(As I said above though... I'm with you and believe that the court went seriously astray in the 'seventies when they came up with this crazy "everything goes" view about what is left to the States, and what is up to Federal authority.)

But, the house is well and truly out of the barn now... (unless we can get them to go and overturn the earlier rulings).
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext