SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: i-node who wrote (514615)9/19/2009 4:37:46 PM
From: combjelly  Read Replies (2) of 1576496
 
"Of course, 100 years ago nobody would have anticipated that science could appreciate a "Big Bang" or what might have happened about its time. "

So?

"Hard to say what the next 100 or 500 years might bring."

Sigh.

So much ignorance, so little time.

If anything can be known, then it wouldn't have been a singularity, now would it? And that means the models we are currently using are flawed in a fundamental sense. Which isn't to say they might not be, and, in fact, likely are. Although not necessarily that particular flaw. Still, to accept the current models means that all speculation about what went before is pointless. The information cannot exist. And this particular flaw has not been demonstrated in any shape or form. So speculation is pointless.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News