The <b>DD</b> Maven Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The DD Maven

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

From: rrufff	9/24/2009 8:09:24 AM
	1 Recommendation of 736

re AURC - As a certain poster likes to imply that I am long (or more than merely trading) certain pinkie stocks, solely because I have posted in the past my opinions, for the record, I haven't even tried to trade this stock since the time surrounding the previous post. I don't know the current issues, but it certainly looks like an outright scam, having failed to come through with any promised proof of actual business over the years. I have yet to see proof that this company owns anything of tangible value. Some longs seem to be posting that Krong owns some assets, or will be changing its business plan, but there is no proof of anything owned by the publicly traded entity. Until I see that, it's not worth trading for anything more than shell value, and the latter is only determinable if there is actual knowledge of the share count, as well as all liabilities! I see that certain poster merely regurgitates old posts rather than showing direct proof (or even the issues or analyses) that stocks are scams but that's par for the course in self-styled "cyber sleupp" land.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next