2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum

GLD 374.94

+0.2%

Nov 19 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: carranza2 who wrote (55488)	9/26/2009 4:44:36 AM
From: Maurice Winn	3 Recommendations Read Replies (1) of 217883

To use them. The only reason to make something is if they will be used in certain circumstances: <Why develop nukes? They are worthless as offensive weapons because no one dares use them.> They aren't useless as offensive weapons. They work a treat. There has already been a nuclear war and the USA won it and the people who were bombed surrendered unconditionally. With atomic bombs, it's very easy for Iran to conquer any non-nuke country in the vicinity. MAD is theoretically a stable situation but it's not. It's only stable until it isn't. New Zealand Prime Minister John Key and USA President Barack Obama both think it's a good idea to get rid of nukes and that is the only way to be sure of not having somebody pull the trigger. It's far better to not want to fight than to be too frightened to do. My neighbours and I get on together because we want to get on, not because we have a balance of terror among us. Mqurice

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next