SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TimF who wrote (72695)9/26/2009 7:20:09 PM
From: Little Joe  Read Replies (2) of 224748
 
I don't know if you are right or not. What I do know is that in Maryland a suit cannot even be filed without a certification from a doctor that malpractice occurred. The case is then heard by a three member commission consisting of a Doctor, a lawyer and a lay person. Either side can appeal the commission's decision to a jury trial.

It doesn't seemed to have helped much. I was a member of several of those commissions and I found most of the claims being filed to be meritorious, and I was joined by the other members including the Doctor.

The cases that we found without merit were "battle of the experts" cases, where we felt that it was a situation where no matter what the Doctor would have done could have been wrong. Oddly enough out of about 12 cases, on which I was a commission member, all of the members agreed on the veridict. There were no split verdicts.

I do believe that the doctors should be more supportive of disciplining those among them who have high malpractice percentages.

lj
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext