SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Apple Inc.
AAPL 278.12+0.8%Feb 6 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: JP Sullivan who wrote (85469)9/27/2009 3:17:43 AM
From: Jeff Hayden1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) of 213185
 
That's a very big, and common misconception.

NASA and the DoD have equipment that may be considered "high tech", but that equipment, while very expensive, uses electronic part that are, in general, 3 years old at the youngest. Why would that be? Two reasons: 1) neither the DoD or NASA can leave well enough alone, they have to "improve" the parts with extra requirements above and beyond that used by the commercial version; and 2) It takes about 3 years or so for a piece of equipment to go from development to production - and the design is initiated with the parts that are available at the beginning of the development, so production equipment uses at least 3 year old parts.

Commercial equipment comes to market with parts that are about a half a year old, purely due to the pressures of competition. The newest commercial technology is ALWAYS much advanced over the DoD and NASA's technology, ALWAYS!

What the DoD and NASA brings to the party is innovative use of old technology. And we need that, even though it is expensive and not as up-to-date as we would like it to be.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext