Gorgias and Aristotle would disagree with you. Gorgias did not believe anything in this veiled shadow world could be known. And even if it could be known it would be impossible to convey. Hence this from the Encomium on Helen.
"Their persuasions by means of fictions are innumerable; for if everyone had recollection of the past, knowledge of the present, and foreknowledge of the future, the power of speech would not be so great. But as it is, when men can neither remember the past nor observe the present nor prophesy the future, deception is easy; so that most men offer opinion as advice to the soul. But opinion, being unreliable, involves those who accept it in equally uncertain fortunes."
Aristotle believed that things could be known but only by rigorous education and training could those things be conveyed. Hence the letter from his pupil Alexander the Great who did not believe Aristotle should rush to publish.
"Alexander to Aristotle, greeting. You have not done well to publish your books of oral doctrine; for what is there now that we excel others in, if those things which we have been particularly instructed in be laid open to all? For my part, I assure you, I had rather excel others in the knowledge of what is excellent, than in the extent of my power and dominion. Farewell."
None of this will make any sense to you...
livius.org |
