Should God be replaced? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Greg or e who wrote (27530)	10/7/2009 3:37:49 PM
From: one_less	2 Recommendations Read Replies (2) of 28931

Most of science supports the big bang theory in one form or another. However, no claims are made about it's cause. Singularity preceeding the big bang is coming into general acceptance but no genuine scientific speculation about how singularity came into being or what caused it to bang. "Everything which has a beginning has a cause. The universe had a beginning. Therefore the universe has a cause." I agree and I respect scientists who are honest enough to say that question does not have a scientific explanation at this point. But then, the Big Bang idea and Singularity could not be explained until recently. Personally I don't see how those notions necessarily contradict the idea of a creator, or even the mystical description of creation we see in the Bible. An Alpha and Omega which is beyond the material universe with a force beyond known laws of physics which could effect the bang. I don't get why peops get so emotional over it. Seems to me one thing could eventually confirm the other with our ever increasing ability to handle conceptualizations on multiple plains of understanding.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next