Should God be replaced? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: LLCF who wrote (27624)	10/13/2009 7:06:39 AM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (1) of 28931

What is unsupported is your opinion that Lombrozo must have been talking only about and studying the opinions of fundamentalist "creationists". The fact that she found no correlation between understanding of evolution and acceptance itself tells you thats not true. For if she'd been studying ONLY fundamentalist "creationists" as you claim there likely wouldn't be anyone in her study that accepted evolution. If that had been the case she couldn't have formed the opinion that she did. ------------------------ if you define evolution as what is commonly accepted as the 'modern synthesis' then I am a "non-believer" if the evolution you are talking about is ANY form of evolution (species change over time) you may get a completely different set of data. You have a point that evolution can be defined various ways.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next