Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: one_less who wrote (520666)	10/14/2009 6:21:22 PM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (3) of 1577698

"Sure, child's play. Your first mistake (childish gambit) is trying to define my position for me" I did not try to define your position. I just picked a topic. I really don't care what your position is, since it is likely to be ill-thought out and poorly defended like the rest of your positions. "I don't consider either of those opposing views to be adequate in explaining critical features of the universe and living things, at least when positioned as one view exclusive of the other." Like what? You need a bit more than just strongly worded statements and hand waving. Actually, ID is more than sufficient to explain any critical feature. All it has to do is invoke "and then a miracle occurs" and it is explained away. Which is why it is totally useless as a foundation for science as we know it. There is nothing to drive questions, the answers are always there. The basic problem is that ID isn't falsifiable, per Popper. Now it was popular in the '80s for the anti-evolution crowd to claim that evolution isn't falsifiable, but they were wrong. ID, however, is truly not falsifiable. Because everything can be defended on the basisc of the whim of the Great Designer.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next