Should God be replaced? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: LLCF who wrote (27662)	10/14/2009 8:35:49 PM
From: Greg or e	Read Replies (1) of 28931

Hey I can't recall ever mentioning you in posts to others but you do it all the time. I don't know if you have a man crush on me or what? "there was no misrepresentation." Sure there was. Too bad you don't appear to be honest enough to admit it and move on. You said: "Greg claims to have it all figured out." In reference to the Trinity. That's a lie isn't it? I have never claimed to have anything "all figured out" The doctrine of the Trinity is a wonderful and mysterious thing. Even though I do not claim to "have it all figured out." I can certainly tell when someone (as you do) is denying the central aspect of the doctrine. "you clearly have no clue what atheism is... as I talk about god in all these posts... take a chill pill and get clue." I linked something to you a while ago but it went whistling between your ears. It was something to the effect that as long as you did not embrace a personal God like the one of Christianity that you were considered an atheist who just didn't realize it. A useful idiot of sorts and certainly a likely recruit to full blown Atheism. The other shoe will drop for you sooner rather than later I suspect. "I (and Christians as far as I know) believe God is omnipresnet... not bound to books... even the bible." I suppose that if you believe that god is everything then it's easy to see how "it" is everywhere but I digress. Again: equivocate and then intentionally misrepresent what was said. That's all you seem to do. No one is saying God is trapped in a book or that the bible in any way limits God. I made that very clear in the last post. Where do you get these hair-brained notions from anyway?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next