SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum
GLD 374.96+0.2%Nov 19 4:00 PM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Haim R. Branisteanu who wrote (56513)10/16/2009 6:33:47 AM
From: elmatador  Read Replies (1) of 217886
 
There is only one thing that solves any problem. THE PRICE.
If fuel costs too much them there is no need for any CO2 scam to extort money.
Fuel must cost a lot so that people use less of it.
Same for water. If water is expensive, it would be treated as precious.

Not entering in the merit of the junk science, upon which GW is based, If heating would be expensive, it would force people from Northern latitudes to pay more for life supporting system they use in winter, which results on more CO2 emitted.

Now gasoline, diesel, heating oil and heating gas must be cheap and there is a scam for tax people?

OECD countries are desperate to find a money earner. They plan use their junk science production to concoct the wayo carbon thing.

Extorting money from productive sectors is one way to do it. Afterall they have been distorting agricultural prices for decades and it has (so far) worked!
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News