SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 221.40+3.4%1:30 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Windsock who wrote (261997)10/16/2009 10:25:48 PM
From: fastpathguruRead Replies (1) of 275872
 
Apparently you are not aware that "Meet Comp" stands for meet competition. The "Meet Comp" process begins when the buyer says: "Hey, AMD is giving me a better deal." Intel responds by giving the buyer a new offer with a lower price and perhaps better terms to match the AMD offer. The competition can continue through more than one round until someone wins the order.

In the Lenova case in the email, competition worked; Lenova achieved lower costs and one of the two competitors -- Intel -- won the business and the other -- AMD -- lost. The "Meet Comp" process is a legal safe harbor to defeat legal claims from a sore loser, like AMD.


I'd agree with you if it weren't for the whole bunch of co-corroborating evidence (affidavits, emails, timing and economic analysis of rebates, competitive environment, and actual cancellation of in-progress product development of products based on sales that AMD had already won) that indicates Intel demanded exclusivity to get the rebates.

fpg
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext