Should God be replaced? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: LLCF who wrote (27689)	10/21/2009 3:42:39 AM
From: Greg or e	Read Replies (3) of 28931

"the word "personal" in the English language has specific meanings. IN FACT you're whole little diatribe revolving around the idea IS TO MAKE GOD PERSONAL in the sense of "a person"..." Words can be used in different ways depending on the context. In this case you are dishonestly using the definitions that have to do with Human beings to answer the question: What is the nature of the Divine being called God. This question came as a direct result of you claiming that the nature of "god" (sic) was an impersonal force while at the same time claiming to be a Christian. I have quoted sources from your own Catholic Church that clearly show that your denial of the personal nature of God is a heresy at best. You continue to dishonestly claim that the idea that God is personal is my own idea when it is clearly taught in scripture and is the official position of the vast majority of Churches including your own. Here is an itunes audio link to an advanced course on "The History of Philosophy and Christian Thought" by John Frame. The last 15 min of the first lesson and the first 15 of the second makes the point that the personal nature of God is a distinctively Christian concept. deimos3.apple.com

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next