SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : A US National Health Care System?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: i-node who wrote (10600)10/21/2009 6:43:32 AM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (3) of 42652
 
In my opinion these are all very extreme positions for an American president to take.

With the exception of the auto bankruptcy, they are nothing new. While not SOP, they are hardly novel. If you want to support "radical," then you have to find NEW perversions. These go to school off previous administrations, including Republican ones. I can't believe you brought up the cabinet officers after Saint Ronnie appointed James Watt. Sheesh!

As for the auto bankruptcy, Obama took an approach less radical than another that was available to him. He used the bankruptcy paradigm rather than the nationalizing paradigm, which he could probably have gotten away with. A radical would have nationalized the industry.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext