Should God be replaced? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Greg or e who wrote (27692)	10/21/2009 12:04:46 PM
From: LLCF	Read Replies (1) of 28931

<Words can be used in different ways depending on the context. In this case you are dishonestly using the definitions that have to do with Human beings to answer the question: What is the nature of the Divine being called God. This question came as a direct result of you claiming that the nature of "god" (sic) was an impersonal force while at the same time claiming to be a Christian.> I'm dishonestly doing nothing... YOU are the one circuitously claiming God personal while having nothing to do with 'people'. As seen clearly above. As for 'dishonesty' I did NOT claim an impersonal God... in fact that is WHY I kept asking for your definition. Which makes YOU dishonest. No suprise there though. <You continue to dishonestly claim that the idea that God is personal is my own idea when it is clearly taught in scripture and is the official position of the vast majority of Churches including your own.> But your definition given here is DIFFERNET than that of many Christian web sites and writtings... therefore there IS NO dishonesty, except by you. In fact many theological writings differ themselves. No suprise there. DAK DAK

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next