SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : ADSOD-Adaptive solutions

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: tonyt who wrote (303)10/31/1997 1:07:00 PM
From: David Barton  Read Replies (1) of 477
 
I see this as a strategic shortcut to getting out of enabling components and into real products. The downside is that Kodak will peel off a lot of margin and is renowned for being nasty and underhanded to deal with, especially with partners. This is not a true acquisition from what I see because Kodak is still involved, which explains the very low price. Kodak's view point is that they still make the money from service and support but don't have to provide R&D or initial sales. Ultra low risk for Kodak with no downside since they decided this isn't their core business. Good for ADSO too if ADSO margins justify the R&D and Kodak doesn't drop the ball on support and service, which they are famous for doing.

All in all, I think it's a wise move but ADSO would do well to remove Kodak ASAP. If the revenue puts ADSO in the black with room to spare, it's a springboard to a truly autonomous business and builds some brand currency in the mean time.

If Meub understands all this and executes accordingly, it's a brilliant move. Otherwise it's niave. I think the former.

-David
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext