SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Knighty Tin who wrote (119854)11/4/2009 10:37:59 AM
From: Skeeter Bug  Read Replies (1) of 132070
 
Knighty, the waterfall has to start somewhere.

truthfully, the only difference between pritchard and the entire state of CA and many of its cities is that

1. city government has a grasp on reality.
2. city government can't/won't paper over their financial position.

it is unfair to solely focus on pensions, though (and yeah, Mish's $12/hr pay cut offer is cold blooded, even if he's technically right that they could easily fill those jobs at that rate). while a big piece of the pie, there is still a lot of pie left to go after, too.

the states are going to have to cut back in a *massive* way and that shoe has yet to drop.

increasing withholding from pay checks is only a way to paper over losses until CA can issue IOUs next year.

then what are they going to do?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext