SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: combjelly who wrote (527678)11/10/2009 7:19:05 PM
From: i-node1 Recommendation  Read Replies (2) of 1575632
 
>> That isn't true. I think it is likely, but it can't be proven.

Of course it is. It WAS proven, at least sufficiently that any court of law would find it compelling. Aside from every expert on the subject who reviewed the document finding it to be bogus, there were clear indications that any non-expert like you or me could discern. For example, the fact that it was proportionately spaced at a time when proportionally spaced typewriters were exceedingly rare and generally not in use in the given environment.

Document examiners found extremely compelling evidence the documents were faked and to the extent ANY document can be proven to be fake, these were. If you want to make the argument that NO document can ever be proven fake, then fine, nothing is 100%.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News