SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Solon who wrote (81629)11/11/2009 2:54:21 PM
From: TimF1 Recommendation  Read Replies (2) of 82486
 
But you have said multiple times that it is DNA that makes an entity "human"

I don't think I directly said that. DNA is a distinguishing characteristic, that shows that the entity is human rather than non human. OTOH the statement is true to an extent. DNA is a major part of makes an entity human, but not the only thing. DNA by itself is not a human and will never develop in to a human.

A sperm has human dna. An egg has human dna.

Not a full set. (You might respond with "a skin cell has a full set", but a skin cell is part of a human, not the whole thing, the DNA in the skin cell is the DNA the human it is part of or came from has.)

A post-birth human is a human, birth doesn't change what the organism is, just its location and environment. From the earliest moment that this organism exists it was a human, that first moment is conception.

WHEN does human dna have human rights

Never. DNA is not a human, or even a more primitive organism, DNA is a complex organic molecule. Individual molecules don't have any rights, definitely not human rights.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext