SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TimF who wrote (81669)11/11/2009 7:26:34 PM
From: LLCF  Read Replies (1) of 82486
 
< Physically separate, isn't required to be a distinct individual organism as my examples show.>

Right and that usage doesn't apply to biological systems in the human body. YOU brought it up... there was no equivocation on my part as anyone can see. Assuming they understand Biology... so I won't claim intentional deception on this one, simply that your assertion was a mistake.

<The claim was separate organism. "Person" was not part of the claim. >

Oh, are you not claiming that a fertilized egg is not only a separate organism (by proclamation,in stark contrast to generally accepted definitions) but a person?

Sorry if I came to that conclusion incorrectly... I thought the whole lead in to "organism" was all about that and abortion however.

<<You went as far as to claim there isn't even a separate organism, based on the idea that there is a physical connection. >>

No, "physical connection" is YOU CLAIM from a while back... the definition I used is generally accepted and a "proclamation" like your assertion to the contrary.

<Parasites are just one example of that point, not the only one I gave, and certainly not the only one that could be given.>

No, it WAS GIVEN BY YOU as an example, and a rather shocking one I must say.

DAK
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext