SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (38465)11/12/2009 5:52:54 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) of 71588
 
would be PREEMPTED and SUPERSEDED by an over-arching federal authority which would deprecate the existing State power

Your conflating the issues about whether the feds get more power over the states (or things the states now mostly control), with the issue of the interstate commerce clause. That's understandable, their closely related issues, and issues with impact on each other, but they aren't the same issue.

If the feds kept the states from regulating in this area or limited their authority to a greater degree than it does now, than yes the feds would be exercising more power here and the states less. But the power the feds would be exercising would be one that its constitutionally empowered to exercise, not just but overblown court interpretations but the the constitution even without such exaggeration by the courts. It would be exercising regulation of actual interstate commerce. So there really isn't a constitutional issue here. We are still left with issues about whether it would be a good idea or otherwise appropriate for the federal government to exercise its constitutional power in this way (not everything that's constitutional is appropriate, and certainly not everything that's constitutional is beneficial), but that's not a constitutional issue any more, but one of practicality and ordinary politics.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext