<People can read and see that you are not telling the truth.>
you must have been looking in a mirror when you said that as ANYONE CAN SEE THIS TRUTH... right in your face:
You:
<<<Then I quoted an Embryology textbook to show that the Human Zygote is a Human Being:>>
Actual quote:
<"A zygote is the beginning of a new human being >>
PERIOD! You own it.
<<Oh look: an new word for you to dishonestly equivocate. >>
Once again, for the zillionth time showing you know not even the basics of logic. I DO NOTHING... YOU misquoted the guy. THERE IS NO USAGE of ANY word by me.
LOL, too funny.
<So when do you think from a scientific view that an unborn child becomes a Human being? This should be interesting. >
Don't know... open to discussion BY REASONALBE PEOPLE... it's NOT BLACK AND WHITE which you insist. Further, you need CONTEXT, which you hate:
example:
Q. What is the purpose of the 'definition'???
A. ???? Rights?
Q. Does our defining one entity affect the presumed definition or 'rights' of others?
A. Yes
Q In what way?
A. etc etc etc
Messy business, as REAL LIFE IS, as opposed to material reductionists who think everything is black and white.
<I don't need to disprove irrelevancies like the fetus is dependent on the mother. >
Of course you dont' "need" to. The fact that you deem the mother irrelevant means there is NO common discussion ground, why to you keep chanting hoping something will change?
Just to reiterate: YOU DEEM THE MOTHER IRRELEVANT to the discussion of abortion at ANY TIME unless her life is in danger.
And I DON"T.
Plain and simple, and known long ago.
<You're the pro death, new age, Catholic, so you would know way more about chanting than I would.>
ROLMAO!! Did you say "equivocate" earlier??? "pro-death"!! Yer a real hoot guy... trying to 'whip up" a little emotion... go down to planned parenthood with your megaphone if you need that. too funny
As for chanting... you're the one who keeps thinking obvious truths (mother and her developing embryo are not separate) will change is you repeat it enough... not me.
You COULD be saying, "yes, but it doesn't matter because....." but you DONT, you try and SHOW THEY ARE! UFB! Then you have to ridiculous habit claiming "equivocation' as you run around trying to find various words that show otherwise!!!! ROFMAO!
Further, YOU are the one trying to make a complex topic black and white, cut and dried... material reductionist... just like your literal view of the bible... material reductionist.
Futher, your willingness to think that YOU can correctly interpret the ultimate truth of the bible means two things... yep, you guessed it: material reductionist... AND relativist...
DAK |
