The Residential Real Estate Crash Index Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: roguedolphin who wrote (229246)	11/17/2009 10:27:44 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie	Read Replies (3) of 306849

I wasn't joking around. I was demonstrating how little I think of people who jump to conspiracy theory conclusions before doing any actual research. so what, you pasted a link to WTC 7 falling down. Is it weird that it fell in the way it did? maybe. The building wasn't undamaged by the WTC towers falling down. It had a giant gash in the building extending several floors. And there was a bunch of diesel fuel in the building that could have fueled a high temperature fire. Is the problem that it is the first building to fail solely on fire? Well let's ask this question, how many high rises have we let burn for hours on end with no way to stop the fire? Could the reason be that the answer is "never". In other words, we didn't know how vulnerable steel buildings are to prolonged high temperature fires? When you can come up with an explanation for the mechanism for the "epic fraud" that makes some sense, then I will take you seriously. If you want me to stop treating you silly, stop being silly.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next