A US National Health Care System? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : A US National Health Care System?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: i-node who wrote (11454)	11/18/2009 8:16:05 AM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) of 42652

but US health care is on the bleeding edge. It costs more, but it is what causes technological development to occur. Without it, technology will stagnate. I'm confused. You want medicine to operate at the bleeding edge in order to push development and advancement. But yesterday you opposed computerizing medical records because we're too far ahead of the curve. I was forced to counter to make the point that development and advancement wouldn't occur if we backed away from the bleeding edge. So why do you see value in the bleeding edge in medical advancement but not in computer system advancement?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next