SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Win Smith who wrote (530170)11/18/2009 10:23:16 AM
From: HPilot1 Recommendation  Read Replies (2) of 1576806
 
Good lord. Do you think just making things up is science? An extremely brief summary, totally at odds with your bizarre "percentage" argument:

You know, I thought my number seemed off. I incorrectly assumed that all of the earths heating is from greenhouse heating. So I will refine it. If greenhouse gas is good for only 59 degrees of the 518 degrees of the earth average absolute temp then 1 degree is 1.69%. CO2 at only 387 PPM is 9-26% (why the wide range, the number should be easy to pin?) lets assume worst case of 26%. So 26% of the earths greenhouse warming of 59 degrees is 15.3 degrees. So now one degree is 6.5% of the total effect. That means that CO2 must increase by 6.5% or 65,000 PPM. So I was wrong it will actually take 32,500 years for the increase in CO2 to raise the earth one degree.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext