SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials
AMAT 256.89-1.2%Dec 31 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Big Bucks who wrote (10174)11/1/1997 12:16:00 AM
From: Stefan  Read Replies (1) of 70976
 
Are you suggesting that there will be no FABs build in the near future just because "No one wants to be last to build the 200mm line" and the 300mm is not ready?
If there is a CEO at any of the semi. co. that things this way he should retire, unless he is trying to sell 300mm equipment.

At this point 300mm will be driven by DRAM manufacturers who need to lower their cost per chip to make any profit.
As you may remember Intel originally did not see need for 300mm line for next two generations of their CPUs. Well, they got "paranoid" when AMD and Cyrix turn on the heat with new offerings. Now to keep their competitive advantage they have to invest in new technologis to increas speed of chips (lower RC and smaller features) and lower the cost (larger wafer, smaller features,incresed yeald).

In the future largest % of productivity improvments will have to come from better processes and improved equipment since there are phisical limits to the size of the wafer and line with.

Companies who are not in commodity business will build 200mm lines even when 300mm will be available. <JMHO>

If you want to have fun, go in to the FAB.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext