Ooops, I got myself confused: <Obama bomb Obama is probably okay, but Osama bomb Obama would perk them up. > I meant Obama bomb Osama is probably okay, but Osama bomb Obama is not, though they rhyme and are sort of palindromic.
Yes, it's absurd that they let the likes of Richard Reid [the shoe-bomber] get on an aircraft without searching him tip to toe, but they take Granny's nail file and they let a raving Moslem extract loads of taxpayer loot for years and then shoot dozens of soldiers right there in the citadel of security.
You'd think that the military intelligence people would notice somebody making Islamic incantations and keep them away from explosives, poissons and so on and perhaps even in a cage until they can deport them to somewhere they'd be happier such as Mecca.
I'm not in the back of the Austral beyond. I'm actually located in a hut in Montana. I found a vacant one with bits of pipe and some sort of manifesto in a drawer. I figure the NSA computers won't find me there.
Because a core tenet of Islam is jihad, and Saudi Arabia bans competing religions from setting up shop there, it would be reasonable to simply make anything Islamic illegal in the USA [and UK, EU etc]. It's illegal to incite violence, insurrection and treason, and that's what Islam does. They are sworn to overthrow the constitution and install Sharia law, which, being a lawyer, you will realize will conflict with the constitution as it is. Since Obama swore to protect the constitution, you'd think he'd notice such a threat right there in the Moslem proponents.
Mqurice |
