SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (38962)11/24/2009 3:00:48 PM
From: TimF1 Recommendation  Read Replies (2) of 71588
 
But very little is spent on prevention.

Again depends on how you define prevention, it seems to mean different things to different people, or to the same people in different contexts.

These diseases are largely preventable and even reversible through preventative measures, i.e., lifestyle, nutrition and physical activity.

They are somewhat preventable or reversible, but not so much through national government policy. You need tens of millions of people to change their lifestyle decisions. Health care "reform" (or even real reform without the quotes) is unlikely to do that. Some small change at the margin maybe, but even if 75% of health care costs "are accounted for by prostate cancer, breast cancer, heart disease, diabetes and obesity", not all of those issues are due to lifestyle choices or issues with preventive medicine, and the majority of those that are do to lifestyle choices aren't going to be easily changed. If you make a huge effort to address the 75% you might save 2% while spending 1% extra on the effort. And if your unlucky, those percentages might be reversed.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext