SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Grommit who wrote (36019)11/24/2009 6:54:30 PM
From: MCsweet  Read Replies (1) of 78666
 
You should know that basically all these BDCs (PSEC, HTGC, PNNT, ARCC, AINV, BKCC, TCAP, MVC, TICC, ACAS, ALD, GLAD, KED) are set up to have high fees, so if you are going to sell on the basis of fees, you should probably consider selling any BDC holding you might have. This is not unreasonable, but I wouldn't single out FSC. BDCs are all essentially run with hedge-fund like incentive structures, or perhaps more accurately private-equity like incentive structures. With BDCs, you are getting investments in private equity.

I would completely agree the fees are too high, but I would also point out that a company like FSC is originating loans to private companies, which requires more due diligence work and infrastructure then a mutual fund manager buying Intel or IBM, so you are going to have live with higher fees.

MC
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext