Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 45.51

+10.7%

Jan 9 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Paul Engel who wrote (38019)	11/1/1997 1:16:00 PM
From: Barry Grossman	Read Replies (1) of 186894

Paul - RE: "They may utilize some StrongArm technology/concepts, but I would fully expect that Intel let's the StrongArm design die by benign neglect. Remember - the StrongArm is a development from the ARM liceese - and INTEL does NOT OWN THE ORIGINAL ARM Intellectual property." What is it that the StrongArm technology/concept enables? Is StrongArm worth so little to Intel that they would squander it - let it "die by benign neglect"? If they didn't use it because they didn't own the original intellectual property, does this mean that Intel won't use or isn't using technology liscenses as a means of growth? What exactly would be the effect of such a policy? Wouldn't it slow down growth if liscensing of technology wasn't utilized as a strategy? Is Intel locked into only utilizing it's own technology? I ask this question cognizant of Intel's many equity investments in other companies, like AVID, RSYS and RMBS. Or - is it the fear of future litigation and it's avoidance that we are talking about? BTW, who is ARM and what exactly is the ARM liscence? Regards, Barry (trying to understand the DEC deal)

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next