GST,
Regarding:
>You are seriously going to have your thoughts organized around some guy who says that, according to his interpretation of the second law of thermodynamics that greenhouse gases cannot possibly exist? That is his proof? That it is theoretically impossible?? Are you really going to go with that?>
I think you are twisting the abstract author's words. I could never fully understand the second law of thermodynamics. Do you understand it perfectly as applied to atmospheric system?
I would like to know:
Is International Journal of Modern Physics B (IJMPB) a reputable journal?
Is their peer review process thorough?
Has the researcher published in other reputable journals in Physics?
I did a brief investigation and found this:
canadafreepress.com
“The main results of our paper are:
- the CO2 greenhouse effect is not an effect in the sense of a physical effect and, hence, simply does not exist;
- computer aided global climatology will not be science, if science is defined as a method to verify or falsify conjectures, according to the usual definition of science.”
“Due to research grants, huge amount of financial support, virtual global climatologists suffer from a kind of omnipotence delusion comparable to the state of highness of the early super string community. However, physics is different. “Physics is where the action is”, I.e., finally, reproducible results in the lab. We cannot overemphasize that science is a method to prove conjectures, and not to go on-stage like the pop star Al Gore performing what-if-when-scenarios beyond any reality and scaring kids.”
“We (Gerhard Gerlich and Ralf D. Tscheuschner) are very sorry that we cannot reply to all statements published in Internet blogs since our “times on-line” are rather limited. Especially, we do not reply to semi-anonymous virtual climate pets like Eli Rabett and other Internet geniusses such as Gavin Schmidt, Stefan Rahmstorf and others at “Real Climate” or “Atmoz Blog” anti-scientific smear sites. Most of them do know so little about physics such that they quote the second law of thermodynamics incorrectly in order to falsify our work. Even the difference between energy, work and heat seems to be unknown to these experts. This cannot be the basis of a scientific discussion.”
“To put it bluntly, virtual climate research (Pierrhumbert and his buddies may call it “real climate” research) is nonsense (non-science). The thousands of publications reviewing the results of these computer games are not worth the papers they are printed on, not to mention the hardware, CPU times and memory.”
Do please make the effort to inform yourselves of the contents of this document and pass it around - it is high time that this news got through to the bureaucrats who appear to be stuck in a self-perpetuating cycle of self-delusion induced by elitist green pressure groups who should instead be deeply ashamed of themselves for abusing their alleged intelligence on continuing the hoax that is mankind’s influence on the climate through emissions of carbon dioxide - the very essence of life.
Please prepare for a sudden and sharp u-turn, that will be far less painful than the continuation of this climate change claptrap.
Kind regards and still waiting to be challenged on the contents of my website or my brain,
-Arun |
