SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Epic American Credit and Bond Bubble Laboratory

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: GST who wrote (106478)12/2/2009 2:55:47 AM
From: Nikole Wollerstein1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) of 110194
 
I understand this part:
"there are no common physical laws between the warming phenomenon in glass houses and the fictitious atmospheric greenhouse effects,"
Greenhouse prevent convection: simply put, glass wall prevent warm air from moving out: obviously increase of CO2 from 0.03% to 0.04% or 0.06%
can not have the same effect.CO2, as wormist claim, can reduce
Temp loss by affecting energy transfer by "radiation", and behind this are some fancy physical models.
What is striking in this part of "greenhouse story" is that apparently nobody bothered to do an experiment to show that CO2 do have warming effect.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext