Data disposed of, data tricked, declines hidden, peer review limited, publications depublished, permissions not granted, data concealed, reputations denigrated ... you Denialists are amusing. <What fudged data? >
What strikes me as odd is that it took the exposure of a lot of emails for people to see it. I suppose they have difficulty seeing causes for things so the behaviour of climatologists over the years wasn't sufficient for people to see what was going on behind the curtain.
When a woman is levitated and cut in half, and disappears, we can reasonably conclude that it's a data trick, not proof of a cause. We should check what the magician is doing behind the curtain, not be gullible, taking them at their word.
People want to believe, so it's easy to get them to wear funny hats, and chant incantations together to mystical Gods, sing Sieg Heil in happy unison and wear brown shirts, sing the Internationale and plan an all for one and one for all Utopia where the masses are massed, there is one Dear Leader, nobody has to work, the government does everything and Stockholm Syndrome reigns supreme.
Mqurice |
