SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (337032)12/2/2009 5:14:29 PM
From: Nadine Carroll9 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) of 793914
 
What's worse, Lord Monckton says that there were only two terrestrial temperature record sets, CRU/Hadley and GISS/NASA, and that they have been closely correlated to each other by members of the "The Team", as he calls it, working in both places. Even worse, the two sets of satellite data, which do not measure temperature directly, had to be correlated with the land based data to be used at all, so if the land numbers are tainted, the satellite numbers are tainted too. The only numbers which are not tainted are raw numbers from good stations (not stations next to heat vents, etc) and the ARGO deep ocean buoys, which have been in operation since 2003. The ARGO buoys show no warming whatsoever.

Lord Monckton quotes the New Zealand numbers, where the raw data is available to the public. Mysteriously, the officially announced results used by the IPCC show warming; but the raw numbers show no warming. The official numbers have been processed in such a way as to artificially decrease earlier temperatures to magnify warming.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext