The Environmentalist Thread Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Land Shark who wrote (26161)	12/2/2009 7:27:50 PM
From: Maurice Winn	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) of 36918

Cant, that's good - they have to work for their money and get things right. The climatologists who have been perpetrating the scam are paid by taxpayers who don't get a say in whether they fund the scam or not. Not only do taxpayers have to fund the false "research" they will also have to pay for the stupid decisions made as a result of the false research, ridiculous computer models, the 5 star jamborees by politicians and hangers-on. You seem to think that the source of funding can affect physics, chemistry and climate. It can't. <CFACT is funded by the likes of Exxon Mobile and Chevron Corp... > That's why the crooks in the climate scam had to "hide the trends", ditch the data, use tricks to present information in deceptive ways, eliminate opposition, denigrate non-compliant peer reviewed publications and so on. Even the crooks' research was coming up with data that didn't fit their half-baked theories. So they had to establish a swindle. Exxon-Mobil, BP, Chevron and anyone can come up with ideas and study things to draw conclusions. What matters is the quality of the work, not the source of the funds. Those in the public trough have been found to be the crooks. Mqurice

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next