SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Environmentalist Thread
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Wharf Rat who wrote (26298)12/3/2009 10:46:28 PM
From: Maurice Winn3 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) of 36917
 
Wharfie, with odds like that [50:50] you don't seem to understand the credibility that you are giving my theory. You are saying it's as good as your theory of Alarmist Doomsterism.

I thought you'd be willing to give odds like 10,000 to 1 that you are right and I'm wrong. But no, it's 50:50. That's coin toss odds Wharfie. It's no-brainer thinking. That's randomness.

I don't give my own theory a 50:50 chance of being right at the next sun-spot low. Reglaciation is looming, and 2020 is a likely time as the planet cools, but it could be any time such as maybe even 1000 years from now.

You obviously have little confidence in your CO2 doomsterism.

Mqurice
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News