SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics of Energy
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: RetiredNow who wrote (14647)12/5/2009 5:34:56 PM
From: Hawkmoon  Read Replies (1) of 86356
 
I explain it as the difference in temperatures between 1951 and 2009 ACCORDING to their model. But I think data upon which the years 1951-1980 need to be reviewed and corroborated

Here's the map from 2001-2009 (if I'm manipulating the fields correctly):

data.giss.nasa.gov

Notice the distinct decrease in the level of warming?

Here's one for the past 4 years (2005-2009).. Look at that big drop in temps around Scandinavia.. But we have a Heat Bubble in Alaska..

The fact is that global warming is still happening due to CO2 and there will be spots around the world that cool periodically.

It's one thing to say the temperature is rising, and quite another to take the leap that it's CO2 related. I'm not saying it's not possible, but you're making an assumption.

Hawk
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News