SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: unclewest who wrote (337432)12/6/2009 2:26:08 PM
From: Nadine Carroll3 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) of 793955
 
It is not a side-effect. The chaos in our federal government is a deliberate result of the Dems Alinskyite tactics. The chaos is primary, deliberately contrived, and created where it doesn't already exist.

But when you create chaos you have to be able to manage in the chaos, you have to keep the chaos from running out of your control. Otherwise you become the victim of your own chaos.

I don't see signs that Obama is managing the chaos. He seems a weak leader to me, with elements of his administration running around confused and semi-independent. The Federal government has a great inertia, and it's not used to being run like this.

Arafat used to manage in this chaotic style, for similar reasons. He was a revolutionary who never made the transition to statesman. He also had a similar passive-aggressive management style. But he kept control of things by having many overlapping agencies (which hindered independent concentrations of power) and by keeping his personal hand on the purse strings, so everybody depended on him for money.

But a President can't imitate Arafat's style because the Federal government has a budget, so Federal Departments are not dependent on the personal good will of the President for their revenues.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext