The Environmentalist Thread Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Alastair McIntosh who wrote (26514)	12/9/2009 11:55:29 PM
From: Win Smith	Read Replies (1) of 36917

That's an interesting site, though in terms of the current dominant paradigm here I'm sure the data is all made up. As near as I can tell, though, Tisdale doesn't really agree with you about OHC (Ocean heat content) and greenhouse gas forcing, see bobtisdale.blogspot.com . That one is a little out of my depth. I think, though, that you're maybe not correct about the forcing needing to go into heat content somewhere; my understanding is that the heat coming in still for the most part gets radiated back out, it just shifts the radiation budget around. There is a lot of stuff going on in the radiation budget, and I don't know how much of it gets reliably measured in the aggregate. There was this nice little satellite, DSCOVR aka Triana, that seemed set to provide a rather handy set of data on that, but it got killed due to an Al Gore association.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next