Politics of Energy Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics of Energy

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: RetiredNow who wrote (15349)	12/15/2009 10:08:35 PM
From: Peter Dierks	Read Replies (1) of 86356

the scientific community has been able to overcome those challenges in recent memory through openness, peer review, and independent verification. Then why don't you demand these processes be applied to the Climate Alarmism "science"? If it were I might take it somewhat seriously. The insiders have manipulated the process to prevent their works from being scrutinized. They destroyed the data rather than allow critics to access it. They blocked critics from being peer reviewers of their works. They conspired to prevent critical works from being peer reviewed favorably. Just one of these should be a red flag to anyone that these are not people who should be relied on. Taken together they form a smoking gun of fraud. So who's winning? Right now, I'd say it's the oil and coal lobbyists. Perhaps. They have bet on both sides. Heads they win, tails they win. Unfortunately civilization does not have the same reward / reward probability. If Climate Alarmists succeed in creating another tax on life, civilization loses. It is like bombing ourselves back into the bronze age.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next