SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics of Energy
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: russet who wrote (15350)12/16/2009 11:17:53 AM
From: RetiredNow2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) of 86355
 
Once again, if you had read my post, you would have seen that I said that a correlation exists, but causality has been called into question. Causality for laymen means which came first, temperature or CO2.

So you repost what I said and claim I didn't say it. Nice.

Also, in my post you'll note that the graphs I posted go back several hundred thousand years. That provides a pretty darn good historical record to establish correlation. No scientist worth their salt at this point would dispute there's a correlation. They may continue to dispute causality, but not the correlation.

And yet, you continue to dispute both, looking at only 100 years worth of data. I find that to be fairly silly and ignorant both.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News