LavaLamp: Re: aberration ...
While the prospect of studying celestial bodies is appealing (are you referring to this month's issue of Playboy, or last's?), my comment on aberration was specifically relating to the records of our transactions. Needless to say, since we don't do any thing productive, we certainly didn't produce records. That therefore is a variance from the norm ... thus, aberrant. My note to self (that's me, you know) was to remind said self to check with Janice at S&L to see what legal gyrations she can do to divert scrutiny away from our rather large empty records cabinet.
Incidentally, you are aware of the negotiations underway with the Federation of Mars, aren't you? We're trying to keep this out of the press until we have a signed contract, at which time we can announce that FBNA has the universe's first inter-planetary Y2K remediation program. There seems to be a snag, however, in the Martian understanding of the problem. Seems they think it's a hoax.
TED |
