SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Alighieri who wrote (537819)12/21/2009 12:24:28 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) of 1576313
 
Yes, we know what CBO thought (in '04), without any scientific evidence to support the position at all.

Here is a more recent study, from this year, which was done with an actual SURVEY:

"About 83 percent reported practicing defensive medicine, with an average of between 18 percent and 28 percent of tests, procedures, referrals, and consultations and 13 percent of hospitalizations ordered for defensive reasons. "

advance.uconn.edu

Or check out the Kessler and McClellan study -- pretty much the previously acknowledged experts on the subject (although CBO doesn't think so LOL) which found that in '05 the cost of defensive medicine was between $100B and $178B/year.

You cite the most incompetent study on the subject -- one conducted by a government agency without any scientific data, at all. I could easily list here 10 studies supporting my position.

Typical.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext