SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Skeeter Bug who wrote (233884)12/21/2009 3:57:29 PM
From: grusumRead Replies (1) of 306849
 
SB: "specifically, what don't you believe and why?"

i don't believe that the videos are giving correct information. i told you i've already watched them and don't believe them.

why? because if there are conflicting views, i can't decide which one is right unless i thoroughly understand and agree with one of them.

someone who does understand money and the federal reserve and its inner workings is Ahhaha. here what he wrote in answer to a statement i presented about the creation of money on his board a while ago.

-------------------------

statement: Money is created when a trader makes a commitment, by buying goods or services from other traders, to place goods or services in the marketplace of equal value in the future.

Ahhaha: No money is created in this "barter". Barter is moneyless. Most transactions are moneyless.

statement: In making purchases, traders borrow against their future production if they DO not currently have a trading surplus.

Ahhaha: Non sequitur or false as a standalone assertion.

statement: Money is created as evidence of that debt.

Ahhaha: Explicitly false. This would be equivalent to the claim that rising stock prices causes rising M2 money supply when only a correlation exists between rising stock prices and rising M2.

statement: There's no quantitative connection between debt and money. Debt = barter. In a debt one agrees to return the money. There's no change in money quantity in that process. When I create a loan there's no a priori consequence to my net income.

Ahhaha: How about C&I loans? Doesn't that create demand deposits? One has to distinguish between the M2 component that comes from private refactoring and the component that's due to FED operations.

statement: Putting goods and services back on the market repays the debt, and extinguishes the money.

Ahhaha: No money is "extinguished" when debt is repaid.

statement: In other words, money is borrowed into existence,

Ahhaha: The economy must be rolling in money given all the debt that has been extended...

statement: and is extinguished as the loan is repaid.

Ahhaha: Then we had better not repay all the debt because then we'd all be pennyless!

statement: The effective lender, or guarantor of a loan is all the traders who trade with the borrower--in short--the community; the market."

Ahhaha: Self-serving distortion. WHY DO YOU believe these ridiculous claims? DO YOU think they can be made rigorous? They can't.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext