SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (40096)12/31/2009 3:24:54 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) of 71588
 
15% or less isn't true. Problematic mortgages where not 15% of the problem, but the majority, esp. if you include the indirect effects.

Also even if it was that small (and it isn't) 15% is far to big to be a mouse. 15% is an important reason.

larger, or at least as large each, as sub-prime

Again the issue I am talking about IS NOT sub-prime. I'm talking about problematic mortgages not sub prime. After one time, I might think maybe I miscommunicated it, after two, I might think, OK, your just being a little sloppy in your reading of the post you respond to, but after its repeated again, and you continue to act as if I was making a point specifically and only about sub-prime, its hard to conclude that your not arguing in bad faith, no matter how much I normally try to give the benefit of the doubt in such situations.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News