Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: skinowski who wrote (341043)	1/2/2010 3:50:43 PM
From: LindyBill	Read Replies (1) of 793964

According to them, if radiation received from a regular Chest Xray is "1", then Calcium score study is 20-40, a diagnostic Coronary angiography is 200-500, and a coronary CT angiogram is 700-2100. Those are significant numbers And they are wrong. At least they err on the high side, hopefully keeping Doctors from overscanning patients. Using a GE Lightspeed 64 slicer, if a Chest X-ray is "1", a Calcium score study on it is "4". If they use the latest software, that reduces to "2". These numbers are all over the place because there are so many different machines of different capabilities out there. Plus, there are a lot of techs that don't know what they are doing. Don't let anybody scan you on less than a 64 slice CT, or an EBT machine. There are still a lot of 8,16 and 32 slice machines being used.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next