<You have exhibited an almost palpable hatred to wards me ever since I pointed out that your profession of being a Catholic and a Christian was incompatible with your views about "god" being an impersonal force.>
Not at all. If you're feeling hatred it's your own... and many of your posts show it; one needs to look no further than the other day when you decided to post to me again. I AM, however, completely indifferent to treating you with respect as you have yet to show you deserve any... and in fact continue to act in a contemptuous manner.
As for "personal God", as I said, your definition (given after months of claiming it was obvious) of personal God is fine with me... as it basically states the existence of a "sentient being" of any kind... nothing to do with "people" at all.
<I see your new word is "projection".>
Naw, you can look back months... I've said you've done this for a long time.
<You see, unlike you, I can disagree with someone without resorting to constant bigoted name calling.>
We see a prime example of projection here. Start with a definition:
"A bigot is a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices."
en.wikipedia.org
Um, Greg... as anyone can see it's YOU who are of narrower, less flexible view on ALL these issues, AND "devoted" (not willing to move beyond YOUR points to find out more). You intolerantly claim to KNOW that abortion of a fertilzed egg is MURDER for example where others aren't so sure. Obstinate? Oh YEA! You intolerantly claim Less is hiding something and that her "world view" (my words) MUST fit into one of your definitions.
I know this all most likely falls on deaf ears, but we're here converse, so I'll clue you in on the above and this:
I think you may want to revisit the concept that you can't know the absolute truth, only YOUR version of it. That might help. Me thinks you have a completely wrong idea of "moral relativism" and it's blocking your brain. :))
DAK |
